« Email marketing: Are you missing out? | Main | Ideas are everywhere »

The performance review conundrum

Victor Aspengren is a vice president at Prairie Capital Advisors Inc.

When companies are asked "What is your greatest asset?", 95% of the time the answer is "our people". If people are the greatest asset and a company wants to maximize its assets, does it not make sense that a return on invest (ROI) is calculated?

Companies measure their performance with monthly financial reports and they slice and dice the numbers of the company in a hundred ways to analyze their ROI. 

The comedy of people being the greatest asset in a company is that the majority of companies only measure their people once a year through a performance review process. To add to the comedy, most companies and their employees would grade their performance review process with a "F".

The following is a short list of typical performance review issues:

  • Rating scales
  • Performance review is concurrent with wage increases
  • Supervisors' (reviewers) lack of preparation
  • No dialog
  • It happens once a year
  • Lack of goals
  • The CEO does not get reviewed
  • The Board of Directors does not get reviewed

The list goes on and on...

Companies should consider making a significant investment in their performance review process.  It could be one of the best first steps to maximize the greatest asset in a company - "the people".

 -Victor Aspengren


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The performance review conundrum:


The comments to this entry are closed.

« Email marketing: Are you missing out? | Main | Ideas are everywhere »

Technorati Bookmark: The performance review conundrum

This site is intended for informational and conversational purposes, not to provide specific legal, investment, or tax advice.  Articles and opinions posted here are those of the author(s). Links to and from other sites are for informational purposes and are not an endorsement by this site’s sponsor.